AFBCMR BC-2013-05312
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT: XXXXXXX
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded an additional 14 paid active duty
training points (Annual Tour), 34 paid Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points and 15 gratuitous
points for retirement/retention year 9 December 2012 through 8 December 2013, resulting in
63 total points; and that the period 9 December 2012 through 8 December 2013 is a year of
satisfactory Federal service.
Members of the Board considered this application on 3 December 2013.
Panel Chair
Attachment:
Letter, AFRC/A1K dated 19 Nov 2013
2
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04147
On 4 October 2010, he transferred from the Air Force (AF) Reserve to the Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of his request, the applicant submits a letter dated 6 March 2014, that states he concurs with the ARPC/DPTS...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02745
He was credited with an additional 2 non-paid inactive duty training points, for Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-02745 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. lieutenant colonel by the Calendar Year 2011 Line and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05693
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. He could have used this time to earn the 33 non-paid points he needed to complete a satisfactory years of service for RYE 17 Dec 12. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01876
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service points be updated and corrected. DPT indicates that if it is the Board’s decision to grant the relief sought, then the applicant’s record should be corrected to award 20 paid active duty points for a school tour from 14 January 2006 to 3...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02094
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02094 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement year ending 23 June 2011 be changed from an unsatisfactory Federal service year to a satisfactory Federal service year by moving his 6 and 7 March 2010 Unit Training Assembly (UTA) points to 10 and 11 July 2010. The relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01227
It is unclear why no medical documentation was provided or why the case was not completed. In this case, he is not eligible for active duty orders. We note that the Air Force offices of primary responsibility state the applicants medical condition was not found to be in the line of duty; therefore no eligibility for active duty orders or pay exists.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03153
He be reinstated as an active member of the Air Force Reserve, effective 15 October 2010, with award of IDT points consistent with the average IDT points he earned between 1 March 2008 and 31 March 2010. In this respect, we believe the evidence provided makes it clear that a serious personality conflict existed between the applicant and certain members of his chain of command as validated by Inspector General (IG) complaints filed by his supervisory chain and the applicant himself, as well...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05860
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military personnel records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. The circumstances that prevented the applicant from obtaining points were that his overage contract was discontinued, FY12 annual training was denied due to lack of funding and late acquisition of funds did not allow him to participate in IDTs for the greater part of FY12 and RYE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02524
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial, they found no error or injustice nor did the applicant provide any evidence to support his claim. The applicant did not provide any documentation to show a professional opinion of a qualified military medical personnel and evaluation for performance was accomplished as required in accordance with ANGI 36-2001. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01721
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...